© 2016 - S2E Partners IT dept.

The Secrets to Successful Strategy Execution

 

1. Everyone has a good idea of the decisions and actions for which he or she is responsible.
 

In companies strong on execution, 71% of individuals agree with this statement; that figure drops to 32% in organizations weak on execution.

 

Blurring of decision rights tends to occur as a company matures. Young organizations are generally too busy getting things done to define roles and responsibilities clearly at the outset. And why should they? In a small company, it’s not so difficult to know what other people are up to. So for a time, things work out well enough. As the company grows, however, executives come and go, bringing in with them and taking away different expectations, and over time the approval process gets ever more convoluted and murky. It becomes increasingly unclear where one person’s accountability begins and another’s ends.

 

One global consumer-durables company found this out the hard way. It was so rife with people making competing and conflicting decisions that it was hard to find anyone below the CEO who felt truly accountable for profitability. The company was organized into 16 product divisions aggregated into three geographic groups—North America, Europe, and International. Each of the divisions was charged with reaching explicit performance targets, but functional staff at corporate headquarters controlled spending targets—how R&D dollars were allocated, for instance. Decisions made by divisional and geographic leaders were routinely overridden by functional leaders. Overhead costs began to mount as the divisions added staff to help them create bulletproof cases to challenge corporate decisions.

 

Decisions stalled while divisions negotiated with functions, each layer weighing in with questions. Functional staffers in the divisions (financial analysts, for example) often deferred to their higher-ups in corporate rather than their division vice president, since functional leaders were responsible for rewards and promotions. Only the CEO and his executive team had the discretion to resolve disputes. All of these symptoms fed on one another and collectively hampered execution—until a new CEO came in.

 

Read more clicking on the below URL

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Posts à l'affiche

Digitalisation: putting people at the centre of the technological progress

September 25, 2019

1/5
Please reload

Recent Posts

July 18, 2017

Please reload

Archives
Please reload

Researches by tag
Please reload

Follow us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square